VCInFocus
  • Oil & Gas Updates for VC
  • VC Maps: Wells & Watersheds
  • Resources & Info
  • Graphics
  • Oil & Gas Photo Gallery
  • One Issue?
  • About & Contact

SB county will vote on Fracking Ban in November

8/18/2014

0 Comments

 
Some news from our neighbor to the north: A group calling themselves Santa Barbara Water Guardians have gotten a proposition on the ballet that would ban "High-Intensity Petroleum Operations. High-Intensity Petroleum Operations include hydraulic fracturing (also known as fracking), acid well stimulation treatments, cyclic steam injection and other types of oil and gas development that use advanced well stimulation technologies." in Santa Barbara County. 


The group says the proposition will only apply to new projects. 


For information supporting Prop P visit: http://www.sbcountywaterguardians.org

VCInFocus is awaiting a response from Western States Petroleum Association for the industry's take on Prop P. 
0 Comments

County is Hopping with Several oil Permits coming down the pipeline

5/23/2014

1 Comment

 
Picture
Yesterday County Planning staff held a public hearing, a normal part of the application process for a modification to a Conditional Use Permit that allows drilling for oil and extraction. 

That plan, includes two "test" wells and the company, DCOR Inc. (Dos Cuadros Offshore Resources) says they won't use hydraulic fracturing. But concerned residents say that they may be able to come back at any time and just add that in. 

The Star's article, printed online yesterday (May 22) is HERE. 

Photo: May, 2014 - a "rig" at a well. Perha


The County heard concerns from the public regarding fracking, cumulative effects, and the close vicinity of earthquake faults in that area. 

Seneca Resources, deepening wells in Sespe

In addition to this project, another larger project submitted by Seneca Resources, involving a proposal to deepen/rework three wells in a field above Piru, hit a small road bump this month when an error in the permitting process was caught by Los Padres ForestWatch. ForestWatch discovered that the applicant had submitted an incorrect CUP with their application, an older one from 1976. That permit had been updated in 1981, requiring a more in depth application process (a minor modification) for the type of work Seneca is proposing. This means that the zoning clearance granted has been revoked, and Seneca will now have to file the proper application for a minor modification. A process which includes a public hearing and environmental review. 

Seneca Resources, 8 new wells in Los Padres National Forest - 

The National Forest is accepting public comment until June 4 on this project. These wells are likely to be completed using hydraulic fracturing. For more info click HERE. 

Other proposals from oil companies are listed HERE. 

1 Comment

LA city Council to vote on fracking ban - why has Ventura County Counsel told Sups they Can't do that?

2/26/2014

0 Comments

 
PictureA truck carrying oil field waste substances driving through Santa Paula on Feb. 26, 2014. Photo by K. Rivers.
The LA times has reported that the LA City Council is going to vote on a fracking ban within their city limits. Other cities around the nation have passed bans, Pittsburgh, PA being the first to do so by local city ordinance. The Pittsburgh city council was threatened with law suits, but none were ever filed. Last year, when the topic came up before the Ventura County Board of Supervisors, County Counsel advised them that they did not have the ability to ban hydraulic fracturing in the County. And Supervisor Steve Bennet indicated he did not "want to create a path to litigation" for the County. 

This brings up issues of preemption and whether the State has total authority over the use of land within various boundaries, it can get a bit murky when you say that the STate has jurisdiction below the ground, the actual drilling part, but the County has authority for the surface. 

Some communities on the east coast have found what might be a back door way to ban fracking by working to ban the transport of fracking waste within their city or county limits.

The LA Times Article: 

First step toward fracking ban in L.A. taken by land use panel

By Emily Alpert ReyesFebruary 25, 2014, 8:25 p.m.

A Los Angeles City Council committee took a first step Tuesday toward banning hydraulic fracturing and other disputed practices tied to oil extraction, winning cheers and applause from a packed auditorium.

"Fracking and other unconventional drilling is happening here in Los Angeles, and without the oversight and review to keep our neighborhoods safe," Councilman Mike Bonin told the Planning and Land Use Management Committee.... read the full article here http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-los-angeles-fracking-ban-20140225,0,3908061.story#ixzz2uVVV21fa

Picture
Trucks carrying oil field waste, including produced water and fluids from hydraulic fracturing and other well stimulation processes line up on Wooley Road in Oxnard waiting their turn to unload at Anterra Waste. Taken Fall 2013. Photo by K. Rivers.
0 Comments

Bill to Ban fracking introduced in CA

2/21/2014

1 Comment

 
PictureProtesters in Ventura gathered in January to ask for a ban to fracking outside of a hearing on new rules to regulate fracking resulting from the passage of SB4. Photo by K. Rivers, VCInFocus
From the press release: 

SACRAMENTO, Calif., Feb. 21, 2014 /PRNewswire/ -- Today, State Senators Holly Mitchell (D-Los Angeles) and Mark Leno(D-San Francisco) introduced legislation to protect the health and safety of Californians from the potentially harmful consequences of unconventional well stimulation and drilling.

SB 1132 calls for a moratorium on all forms of extreme well stimulation, including hydraulic fracturing, or "fracking," and acidization until a comprehensive, independent and multi-agency review exploring the economic, environmental and public health impacts is complete.  The study will also include evaluation of the adverse and disparate health impacts and environmental burdens affecting lower-income and minority communities.  It further requires that Governor Jerry Brown 

act in response to the study's findings to determine if and where fracking and other well stimulation may resume.

"There are a million Angelenos that live within a 5-mile radius of the largest urban oil field in the country," said Senator Mitchell, whose predominantly minority district includes the Inglewood Oil Field.  "In my district vulnerable neighborhoods lie adjacent to drilling operations whose practices go largely unregulated.  Complaints that residents are exposed to hazardous chemicals and toxic pollutants and which cause all kinds of health symptoms have been ignored.  When industrial operations like fracking and acidization disproportionately impact minority communities, environmental justice has been breached and needs to be restored.  SB 1132 will do that."

Current California law does not regulate either fracking or acidization.  Of the more than 750 chemicals used in fracking, at least 29 of them are known to be harmful to human health.  These chemicals, including hydrofluoric acid and benzene, have been linked to cancer, respiratory, developmental, and neurological problems, yet the practice of fracking and other potentially dangerous methods of oil and gas extraction continue to spread.

A bill passed last year requires an independent study of fracking.  SB 1132 would expand its scope to include health risks posed by chemicals used in other forms of well stimulation, the safety of industry workers and nearby residents, as well as the state's water supply.

"A moratorium on fracking is especially critical as California faces a severe drought with water resources at an all-time low," said Senator Leno.  "We are currently allowing fracking operations to expand despite the potential consequences on our water supply, including availability and price of water, the potential for drinking water contamination and the generation of billions of barrels of polluted water."



SOURCE CA Senator Holly Mitchell

Read the Bill HERE

1 Comment

SB Independant examines acidizing offshore

2/20/2014

0 Comments

 
Questions Remain Over Offshore AcidizingDiffering Definitions of Technical Terms May Explain Why Platform Holly Dispute Exists

Thursday, February 20, 2014by MATT KETTMANN (CONTACT)

Last week, one day after a report was released claiming that Venoco Inc. was using a technique known as matrix acidizing to stimulate production from the wells that it accesses from Platform Holly off the Goleta coast, the Carpinteria-based oil company issued a brief statement denying that it was using the process for extraction purposes. “Venoco does not hydraulically fracture or matrix acidize any wells on Platform Holly,” said Venoco spokesperson Lisa Rivas in an email. Instead, she explained that acid is used for cleaning the platform’s well bores, which has been done for several decades. “This is a process that has been used in onshore and offshore oil wells around the world for generations,” Rivas explained.

Read the full story: http://independent.com/news/2014/feb/20/questions-remain-over-offshore-acidizing/
Picture
0 Comments

In North Dakota: The Job Boom revisited - is it really worth it? 

1/20/2014

0 Comments

 
Another story, another perspective of the Job Boom the industry says comes with the enhanced production of oil and gas. This short film from the NY Times, focuses on one woman's experience in North Dakota. California is estimated to have many times more oil under our soil. 
"Running on Fumes in North Dakota," NY Times. 
Picture
Ventura County residents gather outside the state EIR scoping hearing held Jan. 8 at Ventura College.
0 Comments

60 Day PUblic Comment period on CA Well Stimulation Regs

11/15/2013

0 Comments

 
Picture
Photo info: A acid job that occurred in September 2013 in Upper Ojai. In the coming year, operators will have to "certify" to DOGGR that prior to this operation they have notified neighbors within 500 feet of the site, and within 1500 feet of the well bore location underground. Currently no notification of any kind is required.  

The California Department of Conservation, Division of Oil, Gas and Geothermal Resources has released a thirteen page document containing proposed regulations for hydraulic fracturing (fracking), acidization and other well stimulation processes. Today begins the sixty day public comment period and marks the beginning of the formal rule making process which lasts three hundred and sixty five days. Those regulations will take affect January 1, 2015. In addition, DOGGR has begun the drafting of emergency regulations (so called because of the tight time frame with which they have to get them out and implemented) that will take affect on January 1, 2014. 

These rules are mandated by the passage of SB 4 or The Pavley Bill, written by Sen. Fran Pavley (D-Agoura Hills). Beginning Jan 1, 2014 operators will have to certify that they have complied with notification (of neighbors within 1500 feet of the well bore destination and within 500 feet of the well surface location) rules disclosure requirements. The permit process changes in 2015 with an actual application and technical review that will occur prior to permit for well stimulation being approved. 

(edited/corrected 11/19/13) The new regulations apply to "hydraulic fracturing, acid fracturing, and acid matrix stimulation." The article does not apply to "underground injection projects." An underground injection project or disposal projects is defined - in these proposed regulations - as a "sustained or continual injection into one or more wells over an extended period in order to add fluid to a zone for the purpose of enhanced oil recovery, disposal or storage." Various projects that are not covered in the proposed regulations - which are aimed at regulated well stimulation processes - include "water flood injection, steam flood injection, cyclic steam injection, injection disposal and gas storage projects." 

DOGGR expects to have to increase the fourteen cent per barrel assessment that is currently charged to all operators in the state in order to fund the implementation of the new rules. 

“We’re pleased that the State has taken this important step towards providing more public disclosure and environmental safeguards for fracking in the Los Padres National Forest and throughout California,” said Jeff Kuyper, executive director of Los Padres ForestWatch, an independent nonprofit organization that monitors oil drilling and fracking in the Sespe Oil Field. “But there’s still much work to be done. As the regulations are finalized over the course of the next year, we will continue to demand the strongest protections possible to guard against pollution and protect our forest’s watersheds. Our farms, our communities, and our wildlife depend on it.”

Friday morning DOGGR officials spoke with reporters on the phone regarding the proposed regulations and emphasized that while a complex body of laws has been in place for decades covering well integrity and construction the new laws create transparency by improving access to information.

"These regulations give us more information about [hydraulic fracturing] is used today," said Tim Kustic, director of DOGGR. "And going forward. This sets the stage for new and robust regulations." He emphasized that industry has already voluntarily disclosed 1000 fracking jobs in the state on the website fracfocus. DOGGR will use fracfocus in the interim while it develops it's own online database for reporting well stimulation processes. 

"One of the successes of SB4 is that it will increase our understanding of ground water," said Jason Marshall, chief deputy director with the Department of Conservation. 

Also on the call was Tom Howard, executive director of the State Water Resources Control Board. An important part of the SB4 creates for the first time ever in the state requirements for the ground water management plan, and testing for ground water baseline quality. 

Howard explained that the state water board will be entering into a rulemaking process as well as they implement the aspects of SB4 that apply to testing and monitoring of the ground water - SB4 actually creates an addition to the state water code. 

Public hearings are scheduled throughout the state. AT this time there is no hearing scheduled in Ventura County, but Sen. Pavley has requested that one be held, Nechodom indicated they are considering that, but that a workshop will take place in Ventura County as the scoping progresses regarding the environmental impact study on hydraulic fracturing and other well stimulation practices. 

“It is irresponsible for the oil industry to continue fracking our national forest until the regulations are finalized and adequate safeguards are in place to protect our watersheds,” said Kuyper. “ The Sespe Creek watershed is one of our region’s most ecologically sensitive areas, and every precaution should be taken to protect this important resource.”

Visit the DOGGR website to review the text of the proposed regulations and for information on the hearings. 

0 Comments

Breaking: DOGGR to release Proposed regs tomorrow for well stimulation in CA

11/14/2013

0 Comments

 
Just before 5:00 today the California Department of Conservation, Division of Oil, Gas and Geothermal Resources DOGGR, sent a notice to members of the media that at the proposed regulations will be made public tomorrow morning at 8 a.m. This will begin a sixty-day public comment period as part of the formal rule making process. 

A conference call for members of the media only, will take place from 9 to 10 am giving the press the opportunity to ask questions to Mark Nechodom, Director of the Department of Conservation, Jason Marshall - Chief Deputy Director for the Department of Conservation and Tim Kustic, State Oil and Gas Supervisor, head of DOGGR

DOGGR has been holding public hearing to receive input on their draft regulation that were specific to hydraulic fracturing. Earlier this year state legislators realized that DOGGR was not tracking or specifically overseeing the process and so DOGGR was charged with creating regulations. During the latest rule making session the legislator passed one bill - SB4 written by Sen. Fran Pavley (D- Agoura Hills) that will apply to fracking and acidization as well as other well stimulation practices. The bill requires that DOGGR create rules and frameworks for permitting fracking, acidization and other well stimulation practices. It requires the monitoring of ground water, and disclosure of chemicals being used for well stimulation. Supporters of SB4 say that it is a huge step up from having no regulations

Many environmental groups cried foul when they felt that SB4 had been weakened and that it paved the way for unhindered fracking prior to its provisions taking affect. And groups who continue to push for a ban or moratorium on fracking say that SB4 may hinder Gov. Jerry Brown or any local government body from taking action. Pavley has said that is not the case, and that the bill does not interfere with the Governors authority to impose an emergency ban or moratorium if he sees fit to do so. 

Parts of SB4 go into effect on January 1, 2014, while other parts will begin Jan. 1 2015. The rules being made public tomorrow

During the public hearings held throughout the state over the past year members of the public demanded stronger oversight, more requirements regarding notification and disclosure of what chemicals are used. SB4 has added requirements of ground water monitoring and notification of neighboring property owners and tenants.  

What question do  you have for your State Oil and Gas supervisors? 
Post your questions here (comments) or on our facebook page. 
Will your local media be covering this issue? Are they educated about the issue? 


Stay tuned, VCINFocus will be on the call. 
Picture
0 Comments

Ojai Valley news Story: CFROG alleging drilling violations

10/25/2013

0 Comments

 
Story by VCInFocus writer Kimberly Rivers: Local watchdog group Citizens for Responsible Oil and Gas has filed two complaints with Ventura County Planning alleging two complaints against Santa Paula based, Mirada Petroleum. Click HERE for the full story. *Full story only available to those who subscribe to the Ojai Valley News. 
Picture
This is an aerial image from Ventura County mapping. It was shot in 2006 and shows a "pad" that was not there in an image from earlier in 2006 (near the center of image). One complaint alleges that Mirada did not have the zoning clearance or grading permit to clear the forest in that location. The well, Nesbitt 5, CFROG claims was supposed to be put on another existing pad with the other "Nesbitt" wells. The County says they are investigating and expect to be able to respond within 30 days. Legal counsel for Mirada dismisses the complaint saying the pad had been there for "a long time."
0 Comments

Complaints filed in VC alleging violations of conditional use permits: Watchdog group CFROG announced this week

10/23/2013

0 Comments

 
Picture
This week Citizens for Responsible Oil and Gas (CFROG) met with County Planning Director Kim Prillhart and submitted two complaints alleging that Santa Paula based Mirada Petroleum has violated aspects of its conditional use permit CUP to operate oil and gas wells. The complaint focuses on an oil field in the area above Thomas Aquinas College near the Upper Ojai Valley and above Santa Paula. 

One complaint claims that Mirada has violated a recent amendment to its CUP that required it file a form with the state Division of Oil, Gas and Geothermal Resources indicating its intention to idle and abandon several wells. CFROG says that according to the County and DOGGR, Mirada has not yet filed those forms, and the CUP required the forms be filed within 90 days of the permit taking effect. That time period has since expired. 

The second complaint alleges that a few years ago Mirada drilled a well in a section of "pristine" forest without the necessary permits. That well was supposed to be on an existing oil pad, but instead Mirada drilled it in a spot that did not have any wells. 

County staff told CFROG it may take up to 30 days for them to investigate and respond.

Today, Wednesday Oct. 23, CFROG is hosting a breakfast fundraiser where they plan to publicly announce the complaints with Sen. Fran Pavley in attendance. VC

Check this fridays edition of the Ojai Valley News for the full story. 

0 Comments
<<Previous
    For info on map shown above Click HERE

    Hello VC InFocus Readers - 
    As of May 1, 2016, VC InFocus founder/writer Kimberly Rivers was hired as Executive Director for Citizens For Responsible Oil and Gas (CFROG). She will continue to post important information, news and OpEd articles here. CFROG works in Ventura County to ensure oil and gas projects are permitted, conducted and regulated in accordance with applicable laws. To support that important work JOIN CFROG HERE. 

    VCinfocus 
    on 

    facebook


       view VC Spills

    To report a spill 800-OILS-911

    Cal Spill Watch 
    Picture

    Picture
    Picture
    Click photo to see VC Oil Photo Gallery. This photo is of an non-permitted tank installed on property in Upper Ojai. Extensive non-permitted grading occurred, that led to a broken gas line.
    Click here to read story about the permit violations that led to the broken gas line.

    Coming Up In VC:
     
    Recently in California:

    National & Global News:

    Recently in Global News:


    VC peak Oil Study



    VC Oil & Gas Permitting info

    Click for Nat. Geog. video about fracking


    Pro-fracking info


    Click to see map of all wells in CA


    Click here to view map of all VC Earthquake Faults


    National Energy
    News


    CNN ​- Donald Trumps Energy Plan - Less Regs More Rigs

    NY Times Editorial- Who bears the most risk from fracking?

    OilPrice.com When will Solar Overtake oil? 

    SEE ACTIVE OIL Wells in VC

    Click here to view VC Star graphics on google maps showing active wells. AND view oil lease information. 

    Click here to visit the State Dept. of Conservation mapping site to view all wells, active, injection, abandoned; including WELL RECORDS

    who decides?

    Archives

    June 2016
    May 2016
    March 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013

    Categories

    All
    Acidization
    Air Pollution Fracking
    Ban Fracking
    County Planning
    Effects Of Oil Production
    Effects Of Oil Production
    Enhanced Oil Recovery
    Enhanced Oil Recovery
    Fracking
    Fracking California
    Fracking California
    Fracking Legislation
    Fracking Legislation
    Fracking Offshore
    Fracking Offshore
    Fracking Regulations California
    Fracking Regulations California
    Oil Drilling
    Oil Drilling
    Oil Permitting
    Pavley
    Politics And Fracking
    Politics And Fracking
    Profracking
    Santa Barbara Channel
    Sb4
    Steam Injection
    Ventura County Air Pollution
    Ventura County Fracking
    Ventura County Fracking

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly